Frame the decision · Technology · 2–3 weeks · £7,000
Business-to-IT Strategy Alignment
Connect business priorities to the technology agenda and investment choices.
Problem this solves
Strategy exists (or is emerging) but technology direction, investment and operating model are not clearly aligned to it. Leadership cannot see a coherent line of sight from business outcomes to technology choices.
What it is
The alignment brief brings together business strategy, the current technology position and material constraints. Through focused conversations with the MD, relevant directors and technology leads, it surfaces misalignment, competing assumptions and the decisions that must be made. It concludes with a concise alignment brief and a recommended route — not a full estate review or multi-year roadmap.
Key activities
- Review business strategy, current technology position and material constraints
- Hold focused conversations with MD, relevant directors and technology leads
- Surface misalignment, competing assumptions and decision points
- Produce a concise alignment brief and recommended route
Outcomes
Within three weeks, the MD and relevant directors have a shared view of how technology should support the business agenda, the decisions required, and the proportionate next step.
Deliverables
- Alignment brief: business priorities → technology implications
- Material gaps, risks and decision points
- Recommended route (roadmap, operating-model work, assurance, or bounded internal action)
What happens
- Review sponsor material and business priorities needed to frame the alignment question
- Up to four executive or senior conversations, or one structured leadership session
- Facilitate a decision session that surfaces differing assumptions
- Define the alignment decision, material unknowns and the route forward
What you get
- A concise alignment brief
- A facilitated decision session
- A defined next step — a Progressive Grounds product, a bounded internal action, or a decision not to proceed yet
Boundary
Not a full estate review, application inventory, detailed multi-year roadmap or operating-model design. Those are separate products.
What typically follows
Typically leads to Strategic IT Review & Roadmap, Technology & Operating Model Reset, or a bounded internal action.
Scope and investment
| Authorised effort | Derived investment (mid rate) |
|---|---|
| 4–6 days | From £7,000 |
Talk it through.
Thirty minutes with Ian. A straight answer on whether this is the right next step.